Introduction: Confused by dynamic and object in C#? You’re Not Alone!
In C# applications, you may have used dynamic and object types. They both look similar at first glance. Both can hold any data type, and both are flexible. So what’s the real difference between dynamic and object in C#?
In this blog, we will break down the differences between dynamic and object. We will also explore the practical API scenarios which focus on model binding and JSON serialization. We will also discuss which is faster, safer, and easier to maintain.
At the end of this blog, you will understand when to use dynamic and object in a C# application.
What are dynamic and object in C#?
Before we explore practical API scenarios, it’s important first to understand the meanings of dynamic and object in C#.
object – The Base of All Types
In C#, every type inherits from the base object type. That means you can store any value in a variable of type object.
object obj= 25; // Holds an int
obj= "Hello dotnet infinity"; // Now holds a string
But here’s the catch: when using an object, you often need to cast it back to its original type before using it:
object obj = "Hello dotnet infinity";
string txt= (string)obj; // Requires explicit casting
dynamic – Type Checking Happens at Runtime
Dynamic type was introduced in C# 4.0. The dynamic type bypasses compile-time type checking. This means you can call properties and methods on it that the compiler doesn’t validate, but the program may crash at runtime if you’re wrong.
dynamic dyn = "Hello";
Console.WriteLine(dyn.Length); // Works
Console.WriteLine(dyn.NonExistentMethod()); // Runtime error!
Key Differences Between dynamic and object in C#
Feature | object | dynamic |
Type Checking | Compile-time | Runtime only |
IntelliSense | Full | None |
Performance | Faster | Slower |
Error Detection | Compile-time | Runtime |
Maintainability | High | Low |
Flexibility | Medium | High |
Best Use Case | Known types, APIs | Unknown structure JSON |
Real-World Example
Model Binding from JSON
Suppose your API accepts JSON from a client. If you don’t know the exact structure of the incoming data, what do you use?
Example Using dynamic (Good for unknown JSON structure)
[HttpPost("AddUser")]
public IActionResult AddUser([FromBody] dynamic data)
{
string firstName = data.FirstName; // No compile-time check
string lastName= data.LastName;
return Ok($"Received FirstName: {firstName}, LastName: {lastName}");
}
This works if the JSON has those fields, but will crash if data.FirstName or data.LastName doesn’t exist.
Example Using object + Deserialization (Better safety)
[HttpPost("AddUser")]
public IActionResult AddUser([FromBody] object payload)
{
var json = JsonSerializer.Serialize(payload);
var user = JsonSerializer.Deserialize<UserModel>(json);
return Ok($"Received FirstName: {user.FirstName}, LastName: {user.LastName}");
}
Here, the object is deserialized to a strong type, providing type safety and cleaner error handling.
public class UserModel
{
public string FirstName{ get; set; }
public string LastName{ get; set; }
}
Use Cases: object vs dynamic in C#
Use Case | Use object | Use dynamic |
Public API request/response models | Ensures type safety and validation | Avoid – lacks compile-time validation |
Flexible or unknown JSON from third-party API | Verbose – needs manual parsing or custom model | Easy access to properties at runtime |
Internal tools/prototypes | Use when you can define models | Acceptable for quick JSON or dynamic data |
Temporary storage for different types | Store as object, cast back when needed | Overkill – unnecessary overhead |
Serialization/Deserialization scenarios | Use strongly typed models for predictable schema | Use for unstructured JSON or loosely defined schemas |
COM interop / Office automation | Verbose and complex with object | Preferred for dynamic runtime interactions |
Reflection-based property access | Controlled, but more verbose with type checking | Cleaner, but riskier – depends on accurate member names |
Plugin architectures / dynamic scripting | Not flexible enough for dynamic method/property calls | Excellent for runtime extensibility |
Working in large teams or enterprise projects | More maintainable, testable, and readable | Can cause hidden bugs and make code harder to maintain |
Rapid JSON manipulation (e.g. admin dashboards) | Slower and needs mapping | Faster iteration, especially in internal or trusted scenarios |
Conclusion
Understanding the difference between dynamic and object in C# is crucial for building clean, safe, and high-performance code.
- Use object when you want: type safety, performance, and maintainability.
- Use dynamic when you need: flexibility, unknown data structures, or dynamic language interop.
Also Read,
- 5 Powerful Types of Constructors in C#: Simplify Your Code!
- Mastering Pattern Matching in C#
- Mastering C# 12: Brilliant Features That Crush Limitations